Help
Sign In
evolution of
August 2008 
Indigo Evolution?
Posted on Dec 17th, 2007
by 
shaman sun
shaman sun
I recently saw the film "Indigo Evolution," and I must say I felt very compelled to express my reflections on this. The film set me off, and not in an positively inspired way. If indigos are meant to be "system busters," then I'm going to have to bust this one. Please bear with me. I do not mean to be attacking anybody or their beliefs, nor do I mean to sound arrogant and pompous, but at the same time I can't remain silent on this.
So what is an indigo? And, how does this documentary depict them? It provides some general concepts about indigos: they are myth busters, they are skilled in non-traditional ways, sometimes appearing as savants, sometimes as musicians. In general, they are bored with the traditional culture, they are disillusioned and are seeking new ways to live. Some of the speakers in this documentary describe every child as an indigo. Personally, I do not see this as something truly unique - it's a result of everything that has happened before, and may have something to do with bigger concepts such as the evolution of consciousness.
So, the description of what it means to be an indigo is so general, that I feel that I witnessed many individuals jumping the gun on identifying themselves with the "indigo" identity simply because they share some basic similarities. So I must ask this question: Are you truly enacting what it is to be an indigo or are you simply finding a self-image you are more comfortable with? This may seem harsh, but I feel it's an important question. Are we playing with concepts, identity and self-images instead of directly experiencing the unity-consciousness, cosmic consciousness, transpersonal states that the sages have spoken of in the past?
I truly feel that indigos are much more rare than depicted in these videos. And that many of these children are encouraged to talk like they do, and express ideas because they are exposed to them through their parents. I feel that many of the children are taught that they are special.
I wonder how many of these speakers realize that children go through their own evolution of consciousness before they reach adulthood? That we are more myth-based when we are younger, absorbing everything our parents do and say to such a level that the parents may not even realize how strongly they influence their children with ideas and concepts?
Also, the concept of the "pure" child I feel is severely mistaken. It is true that when we are young, we are not yet conditioned with society, yet at the same time, we are not like sage or the Buddha. Why is this? Because although our minds are empty and open, the wisdom and knowledge, the maturity has not yet blossomed. It is like the simplicity of a seed compared to the openness of a flower. The two are surely connected, yes! But the seed must blossom first before it is to truly shine with that potential. So then,the non-rational aspects children speak of are mistaken for the sagely, trans-rational words you would hear from, say, Buddha or Ramana Maharshi, or Rumi.
It may be true that indigos are "Older" souls, yes! But they aren't born reciting their own Rumi-like poetry. They develop into it as they grow up. They go through all the stages of development like everyone else, but perhaps at an accelerated rate.
A good friend of mine had an interesting conversation about indigos, and I'll attempt to recreate it in a discussion form:
Q: So, what do you think of the term indigo?
A: Ugh. I try not to use it. I prefer the term "HSP."
Q: HSP? You mean hypersensitives?
A: Yes, those are the only "indigos" I am willing to accept at the moment. Individuals with a heightened sensory perception. I feel that the term "indigo" i used too lightly. It's just become another ideal, like so many other things of this culture.
Q: So in a sense, it has become just like the system it was meant to break down?
A: Yes, they have just found another ideal and lifestyle to follow.
Q: But what about the description for indigo children? ADHD, child prodigies, etc. Doesn't that show some kind of wisdom? Or heightened ability?
A: You can have ADHD and not be an "indigo." That's entirely possible. In fact, there is a huge difference. You can be very talented and not be an indigo, or HSP. The world is full of talented individuals. Are we going to call anyone with any form of talent or different learning ability an "indigo?" Don't you see how this is too generalizing?
Q: * I show her the child prodigy clip from the film - the 10 year old painter* What she be a good example of what you mean?
A: Yes. There you have it. She is certainly skilled, a prodigy even. But being a prodigy doesn't mean you are an HSP or an Indigo. It just means you are a prodigy. You have extaordinary talent, but what's there to make me believe you are an indigo?
Q: Well, how about the concepts conveyed in the imagery? The poems? The discussion?
A: She is 10 years old, and although I am sure her mind is developed in certain areas most others are not, I don't feel a sense of wisdom coming from her paintings, or from her dialogue. What she is describing sounds exactly like something her parents would have told her, or something she has picked up from her time here already.
Q: So, in other words, the concepts are there, the talent is there - but the actual energy and depth, sensitivity to these heightened states is missing?
A: Basically, yes. She has talent. But I don't feel much else. You know Alex Grey? He might be an HSP. His paintings express a very heightened sense of awareness, very detailed, quite vibrant. He doesn't necessarily have to be a prodigy painter. It's the energy behind the content that matters.
Q: I see. Do you believe any children are HSP's?
A: Yes. I am one. And let me tell you, it's not always a wonder. It's very rough living in this world and being an HSP. You have to be careful, things affect you more. A funeral passed by the other day on the road, and I began to cry. I couldn't help but pick up on the emotions of the family.
Q: So an HSP is a form of "empath", and that being under the general list of things they are hypersensitive about?
A: Yes. It varies but yes. We are "hyper sensitive"on a bodily level to foods, touch, sound, hearing, smell. At a mental level we are more intuitive to our thoughts, feelings, basic ego and subconscious. And we are more sensitive to others egos, minds, etc. On a spiritual level we are more sensitive to the subtle energies of the universe.
Q: That makes more sense. So, you can't just say, "I am an indigo." or "I am an HSP."
A: Yes, but you can't say we are very unique either. We experience things that are present for everyone - perhaps more intensely, but everyone is capable of cultivating awareness. We all can simply "be" and "be aware" of this. That is what I hope others can see. Instead of putting us on a pedestal, they should just listen to what we have to say about human nature. That we are actually all one. This isn't a concept. so many of us follow concepts. You must drop your baggage in order to truly know this. There is a difference between knowledge and knowing. Too many of us are concerned with knowledge and not with true knowing, which is wisdom.
So what is an indigo? And, how does this documentary depict them? It provides some general concepts about indigos: they are myth busters, they are skilled in non-traditional ways, sometimes appearing as savants, sometimes as musicians. In general, they are bored with the traditional culture, they are disillusioned and are seeking new ways to live. Some of the speakers in this documentary describe every child as an indigo. Personally, I do not see this as something truly unique - it's a result of everything that has happened before, and may have something to do with bigger concepts such as the evolution of consciousness.
So, the description of what it means to be an indigo is so general, that I feel that I witnessed many individuals jumping the gun on identifying themselves with the "indigo" identity simply because they share some basic similarities. So I must ask this question: Are you truly enacting what it is to be an indigo or are you simply finding a self-image you are more comfortable with? This may seem harsh, but I feel it's an important question. Are we playing with concepts, identity and self-images instead of directly experiencing the unity-consciousness, cosmic consciousness, transpersonal states that the sages have spoken of in the past?
I truly feel that indigos are much more rare than depicted in these videos. And that many of these children are encouraged to talk like they do, and express ideas because they are exposed to them through their parents. I feel that many of the children are taught that they are special.
I wonder how many of these speakers realize that children go through their own evolution of consciousness before they reach adulthood? That we are more myth-based when we are younger, absorbing everything our parents do and say to such a level that the parents may not even realize how strongly they influence their children with ideas and concepts?
Also, the concept of the "pure" child I feel is severely mistaken. It is true that when we are young, we are not yet conditioned with society, yet at the same time, we are not like sage or the Buddha. Why is this? Because although our minds are empty and open, the wisdom and knowledge, the maturity has not yet blossomed. It is like the simplicity of a seed compared to the openness of a flower. The two are surely connected, yes! But the seed must blossom first before it is to truly shine with that potential. So then,the non-rational aspects children speak of are mistaken for the sagely, trans-rational words you would hear from, say, Buddha or Ramana Maharshi, or Rumi.
It may be true that indigos are "Older" souls, yes! But they aren't born reciting their own Rumi-like poetry. They develop into it as they grow up. They go through all the stages of development like everyone else, but perhaps at an accelerated rate.
A good friend of mine had an interesting conversation about indigos, and I'll attempt to recreate it in a discussion form:
Q: So, what do you think of the term indigo?
A: Ugh. I try not to use it. I prefer the term "HSP."
Q: HSP? You mean hypersensitives?
A: Yes, those are the only "indigos" I am willing to accept at the moment. Individuals with a heightened sensory perception. I feel that the term "indigo" i used too lightly. It's just become another ideal, like so many other things of this culture.
Q: So in a sense, it has become just like the system it was meant to break down?
A: Yes, they have just found another ideal and lifestyle to follow.
Q: But what about the description for indigo children? ADHD, child prodigies, etc. Doesn't that show some kind of wisdom? Or heightened ability?
A: You can have ADHD and not be an "indigo." That's entirely possible. In fact, there is a huge difference. You can be very talented and not be an indigo, or HSP. The world is full of talented individuals. Are we going to call anyone with any form of talent or different learning ability an "indigo?" Don't you see how this is too generalizing?
Q: * I show her the child prodigy clip from the film - the 10 year old painter* What she be a good example of what you mean?
A: Yes. There you have it. She is certainly skilled, a prodigy even. But being a prodigy doesn't mean you are an HSP or an Indigo. It just means you are a prodigy. You have extaordinary talent, but what's there to make me believe you are an indigo?
Q: Well, how about the concepts conveyed in the imagery? The poems? The discussion?
A: She is 10 years old, and although I am sure her mind is developed in certain areas most others are not, I don't feel a sense of wisdom coming from her paintings, or from her dialogue. What she is describing sounds exactly like something her parents would have told her, or something she has picked up from her time here already.
Q: So, in other words, the concepts are there, the talent is there - but the actual energy and depth, sensitivity to these heightened states is missing?
A: Basically, yes. She has talent. But I don't feel much else. You know Alex Grey? He might be an HSP. His paintings express a very heightened sense of awareness, very detailed, quite vibrant. He doesn't necessarily have to be a prodigy painter. It's the energy behind the content that matters.
Q: I see. Do you believe any children are HSP's?
A: Yes. I am one. And let me tell you, it's not always a wonder. It's very rough living in this world and being an HSP. You have to be careful, things affect you more. A funeral passed by the other day on the road, and I began to cry. I couldn't help but pick up on the emotions of the family.
Q: So an HSP is a form of "empath", and that being under the general list of things they are hypersensitive about?
A: Yes. It varies but yes. We are "hyper sensitive"on a bodily level to foods, touch, sound, hearing, smell. At a mental level we are more intuitive to our thoughts, feelings, basic ego and subconscious. And we are more sensitive to others egos, minds, etc. On a spiritual level we are more sensitive to the subtle energies of the universe.
Q: That makes more sense. So, you can't just say, "I am an indigo." or "I am an HSP."
A: Yes, but you can't say we are very unique either. We experience things that are present for everyone - perhaps more intensely, but everyone is capable of cultivating awareness. We all can simply "be" and "be aware" of this. That is what I hope others can see. Instead of putting us on a pedestal, they should just listen to what we have to say about human nature. That we are actually all one. This isn't a concept. so many of us follow concepts. You must drop your baggage in order to truly know this. There is a difference between knowledge and knowing. Too many of us are concerned with knowledge and not with true knowing, which is wisdom.
Access: PublicTagged with: indigo children, HSP, sensitivity, subtle causal, flatland, evolution of, pre/trans fallacy
Interesting post… But I was wondering what you feel about the whole history of Indigos? Like this article that says:
“The Indigo Children have been incarnating on the Earth for the last 100 years. The early Indigos were pioneers and wayshowers. After World War II, a significant number were born, and these are the Indigo adults of today. However, in the 1970s a major wave of Indigos was born, and so we have a whole generation of Indigos who are now in their late twenties and early thirties who are about to take their place as leaders in the world. Indigos continued to born up to about 2000, with increasing abilities and degrees of technological and creative sophistication”.
Do you believe that there really is an indigo “wave” taking over? Is it really intentional? For a reason?
By the way, that artist you mentioned, Akiane Kramarik, … it's easy to assume that the messages in her paintings or the poems she read were basically fed to her by her parents… But from what I understood, her mother claims that the two parents were athiests until their daughter was born… They didnt believe in God and they didnt teach their daughter to believe in God… If anything, its almost as if this little girl CHOSE to be born into this family in order to show them “another way…”
Just a thought…
Hey Shira,
Thanks for responding! Don't get too many comments these days….
I'm going to have to believe that there is a wave, but it is not taking over. I feel there might be, more generally speaking, a higher, deeper structure of consciousness unfolding - but more gradually. In my own experience it seems hardly the case that hypersensitives are abundant. If you are familiar with some of the many theories on the evolution of consciousness, there seems to be a common theme:
that there is a new unfolding “wave” of consciousness that is gradually increasing in the population.
myths about this new wave, coming from various cultures and sources, have arisen. Indigo Children, Star Children, Crystal and Rainbow Children in the “new Age.” Less myth based but heavily related: 2012, “Christ Consciousness,” “Krishna Consciousness,” etc.
each group is attempting to translate the changing structures of perception, or, effectively translating it into a meaningful understanding.
a less 'myth' based, but more theoretical based answer to this is in integral theory. there are many 'waves' of consciousness unfolding in the “spiral” of evolution. and “integral” consciousness is slowly beginning to emerge. system busters, ideology busters, those who see underlying meaning across various fields, who can authentically use psychic powers and connect with others, who appear to more naturally carry the wisdom of the sages, etc - these are just the next unfolding wave of human consciousness. terms like “indigo” seem a little too narrow, and too heavily weighed down with ideals and myths, in my opinion, to be universal. if anything, the indigo image is an icon.
I don't know about Akiane. Where is she located? The US? if so, it'd be very difficult for anyone, especially children, to avoid a culture heavily saturated in protestant/catholic beliefs. And even if it is not as easy as this, we as human beings have a natural inclincation to spirituality, and perhaps as a prodigal artist that is her source of inspiration. It's very possible indeed. In Buddhism, they say that anyone can help decide where they are going to emerge in their next life. That you can 'navigate' the Bardo realms between lives and effectively have intention as to where you will end up. This is just throwing another theory out there. I really don't know for sure, but it's very possible it could have been intentional. There are alot of things about life we are yet to understand. And I do not think that spirituality, or even intentionality is unique to indigos at all. If anything I see that there are older souls that have slowly begun to drop their baggage, and now it's time for them to learn new lessons and emerge in this consciousness, because more people are ready to begin shifting. Still, indigo seem to be idealized beyond their scope, and it seems this has only proven to make them into gods and put them on pedestals, when all they are teaching is to “just be.”
peace, being
shaman sun